What These Conversations Enable

Panels often fail because no one is managing the psychological dynamics in the room. My background in behavioral science allows me to work with the psychology of opinion-forming and bias in real time — helping people speak more clearly, feel safer doing so, and engage with opposing views without the conversation breaking down.

Such approach makes it possible to:

• disagree without escalation or defensiveness,
• explore nuance without losing momentum,
• include multiple perspectives without turning the discussion into a shouting match,
• surface what’s really driving opinions beneath polished arguments,
• give audiences insight they can actually use after the event.

Topics These Panels Are Especially Suited For

• Technology, AI, and fear-driven narratives: why anxiety spreads faster than facts, how uncertainty shapes adoption, and how to introduce AI without stripping work of meaning.
• Work, wellbeing, and burnout: why exhaustion persists even in organizations that genuinely care.
• Leadership and organizational change: why change efforts meet resistance, and how cognitive biases shape leadership decisions.
• Social polarization and identity: why debates slide into “us vs. them” thinking, and how identity and evolutionary psychology shape public discourse.
• Ethics and responsibility: how good intentions collide with real human behavior in CSR, public policy, and organizational decisions.

How I Moderate Conversations

• listening for psychological drivers, not just stated opinions,
• naming patterns when discussions start to derail,
• slowing things down when certainty arrives too quickly,
• challenging oversimplified narratives without putting people on the defensive,
• creating space for disagreement without turning it into spectacle.